Hi,
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 08.08:26 Piavlo wrote:
> Maintaining snapshot hierarchy by external application is not reliable
> and error prone
> compared to maintaining it withing the btrfs itself,
> probably by adding the parent treeid field for every shapshot/subvolume.
What should, in your opinion, happen if the parent snapshot is deleted?
Orphan? Re-parent to parent of parent? I guess depending on application,
there may be more than one "right" solution.
cheers
-- vbi
--
When Al sends me patches, I apply them.
I worry what would happen if I didn't.
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
