Andi Kleen wrote: > jim owens <jowens@xxxxxx> writes: > >> The existing core code for pagecache >> doesn't work for directio because the existing I/O routines depend >> on peeking inside a struct page to get the valid btrfs inode info. >> Sorry, no can do, we don't own that page. And rewriting the whole >> pagecache I/O stack to eliminate dependence on struct page would >> be too scary IMO. > > That would simply need another passed argument in a few strategic > places, won't it? I can't imagine it would need a full "rewrite" I should not have said "rewrite", it is the wrong word, and yes some changes in some places would be easy. jim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
