Hi Sander, On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 08:52 +0100, Sander wrote: > I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a > lot of bad sectors on that disk reported by SMART. > > If that is indeed the case it might be dificult for the people who might > be able to help you, to help you. Thanks for your response. You're correct about the bad sector warning. So please correct me if I have some mistaken assumptions. I thought btrfs would be tolerant of that -- if a block failed the checksum test, it would reconstruct and remap it. (Also, I assumed that if a drive hadn't filled its bad sector remapping table, it could handle it at the hardware level, and SMART's warning was just that -- a warning, not a dire pronouncement of utter unsuitability -- but that's something else.) Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
