Hi All:
I'm sorry for my stupid. I am crazy for fixing this bug.
And make so much mistake.
Maybe I need cool down and think more.
--
Best Regards,
Liuwenyi
2009-12-22
2009/12/22 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:52:58PM +0800, Liuwenyi wrote:
>> @@ -102,12 +102,9 @@ static int btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle
>> *trans,
>> char *value = NULL;
>> mode_t mode;
>>
>> - if (acl) {
>> - ret = posix_acl_valid(acl);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - return ret;
>> - ret = 0;
>> - }
>> + ret = posix_acl_valid(acl);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>
> ... and now you can't remove acl from btrfs inode. At all.
>
> NAK the entire series. You are changing existing user-visible behaviour
> for all filesystems for no reason and at least in this case it's clearly
> wrong change.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
