__tree_search() returns the reverse result about the prev node and the next node. And we can
get the prev node and the next node directly by rb_prev() and rb_next(), so it is unnecessary
to use while loop to get them.
This patch fixes this bug of the wrong result.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 13 ++++---------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
index 46bea0f..16744f4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
@@ -136,20 +136,15 @@ static struct rb_node *__tree_search(struct rb_root *root, u64 offset,
if (prev_ret) {
orig_prev = prev;
- while (prev && offset >= extent_map_end(prev_entry)) {
- prev = rb_next(prev);
- prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
- }
+ if (prev && offset < prev_entry->start)
+ prev = rb_prev(prev);
*prev_ret = prev;
prev = orig_prev;
}
if (next_ret) {
- prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
- while (prev && offset < prev_entry->start) {
- prev = rb_prev(prev);
- prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
- }
+ if (prev && offset >= extent_map_end(prev_entry))
+ prev = rb_next(prev);
*next_ret = prev;
}
return NULL;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html