Jean-Sébastien Trottier wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:57:45AM -0500, jim owens wrote:
Jean-Sébastien Trottier wrote:
In the case of RAID1 (or even RAID10), what happens if loop0 is the
current master but is corrupted/dead and you want to mount loop1 to
recover your data?
The problem does not occur with raid1. In that case, both copies
are updated and either can mount. For raid10, 2 of the 4 devices
should always be mountable (you still have to find which 2).
Hmmm... But Andi's original post shows he was having this problem with
RAID1, no?
Ah, yes, I missed the raid1 part on the original post.
So I do not understand why it does not work correctly for
him to mount either device. Maybe this problem is not
what I see in my testing (using 32) with disk partitions
instead of loop.
With partitions, I only see the mount problem on raid0,
not on raid1.
jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
