On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:57:45AM -0500, jim owens wrote: > Jean-Sébastien Trottier wrote: > >In the case of RAID1 (or even RAID10), what happens if loop0 is the > >current master but is corrupted/dead and you want to mount loop1 to > >recover your data? > > The problem does not occur with raid1. In that case, both copies > are updated and either can mount. For raid10, 2 of the 4 devices > should always be mountable (you still have to find which 2). Hmmm... But Andi's original post shows he was having this problem with RAID1, no? JST. > > The "guess who is the mountable device" problem occurs on raid0 > and on the (not yet in-tree) raid5/6. Better error recovery is > one of the projects that needs to be done. > > jim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
