Re: [PATCH 4/4] add snapshot/subvolume destroy ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:27:57PM +0800, john wrote:
>    After a git bisect, I think this patch may introduce a performance
>    regression(about 15% slower) in postmark benchmark. Sometimes(last a few
>    seconds) in the test, CPU usage is 100% wait but NO IO is performing, it's
>    not IO-wait. This didn't happen for earlier versions.
>    test*environment:
>    hard disk: INTEL X25-E SSD 64G
>    mkfs options: mkfs.btrfs -m single /dev/xxx
>    mount options: -o ssd,nodatasum,nodatacow

Thanks, I'll give this a shot here.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux