Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
Steven Pratt wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:41:48PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
Only bit of bad news is I did get one error that crashed the system
on single threaded nocow run. So that data point is missing.
Output below:
I hope I've got this fixed. If you pull from the master branch of
btrfs-unstable there are fixes for async thread races. The single
patch I sent before is included, but not enough.
Glad you said that. Keeps me from sending the email that said the
patch didn't help :-)
Steve
Well, still getting oopses even with new code.
Lots of:
Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] BUG: soft lockup -
CPU#10 stuck for 61s! [btrfs-endio-1:30250]
Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] Pid: 30250, comm:
btrfs-endio-1 Not tainted 2.6.31-autokern1 #1 IBM x3950-[88726RU]-
Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] RIP:
0010:[<ffffffff81153920>] [<ffffffff81153920>] crc32c+0x20/0x26
If I'm reading this right, you've got a softlockup in crc32c? Something
has gone really wrong here. Are you reusing datasets from old runs?
No, mkfs before every run.
Steve
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
