Re: [PATCH] don't OOPs when we are not raid56

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:32 -0400, jim owens wrote:
> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ again:
>                 multi->num_stripes = num_stripes;
>                 multi->max_errors = max_errors;
>         }
> -       if (raid_map_ret) {
> +       if (raid_map) {
>                 sort_parity_stripes(multi, raid_map);
>                 *raid_map_ret = raid_map;
>         }

Applied (manually, because I think your mail was whitespace-damaged).
Thanks.

Chris, where do we stand with getting this merged? You were going to
sort out the upper layers to handle the minimum write size, weren't you?

I'm also going to do RAID50/60 support, and with hpa's help I'll extend
it to do RAID7/70 too -- but you're not waiting for that, are you?
 
-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux