Re: [PATCH] Don't exist from cleaner_kthread and transaction_kthread until kthread_should_stop is true

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



However, it seems that the kthread_stop() patch is not yet applied.
Linux 2.6.30.5 still use the order one.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, 홍신 shin hong<hongshin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, Vitaily Gusev notice me that kthread_stop() has been changed
> recently so that it may executed for threads which was existed.
> (commit  63706172f332fd3f6e7458ebfb35fa6de9c21dc5
>              kthreads: rework kthread_stop())
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux