Hello, shouldn't the ioctl number used by the BTRFS file system be mentioned in the documentation ioctl numbers list? Cheers, Giuseppe >From 8cc465afd0bcfcb8930593af667f12a9ee096d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivano@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:33:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] documentation: update the ioctl numbers list Mention the ioctl number used by BTRFS. --- Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt b/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt index 1f779a2..fe91e3e 100644 --- a/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt +++ b/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments <http://www.proximity.com.au/~brian/winradio/> 0x90 00 drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.h 0x93 60-7F linux/auto_fs.h +0x94 01-0E fs/btrfs/ioctl.h BTRFS 0x99 00-0F 537-Addinboard driver <mailto:buk@xxxxxxxxxxx> 0xA0 all linux/sdp/sdp.h Industrial Device Project -- 1.6.3.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
