Re: RAID[56] with arbitrary numbers of "parity" stripes.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22. aug.. 2009, at 17.34, tsuraan wrote:

We discussed using the top bits of the chunk type field field to store a number of redundant disks -- so instead of RAID5, RAID6, etc., we end up
with a single 'RAID56' flag, and the amount of redundancy is stored
elsewhere.

Is there any sort of timeline for RAID5/6 support in btrfs?  I
currently have 8 drives in a zfs-fuse RAIDZ2 (RAID6) configuration,
and I'd love to see how btrfs compares to that, once it's ready.


I think someone started doing RAID[56] (see threads "A start at RAID[56] support" and perhaps "Factor out RAID6 algorithms into lib/". Seems something is in the works.

By the way - how does FUSE ZFS work? Is it stable? Good performance? We're using ZFS natively on Solaris 10 now, perhaps moving the storage to opensolaris soon.

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux