Re: Crash in __btrfs_reserve_extent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Josef Bacik

> What kernel are you running?  I need to get a look at what code you
> are on. Thanks for the image, I'm having some trouble getting it to
> work, but I will let you know what I come up with.

I was running 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE at the time of the crash, and
when I've been having problems.  I see that there's a new F11 kernel
out - I'll try to upgrade to that one and will let you know if there's
any change (I doubt it - there's no mention of btrfs-related changes).

Here's the output from btrfs-show, just figured out that I shouldn't
have supplied any arguments (thanks to Robert Förster):

Label: none  uuid: 94762921-dbc0-4faf-a4e5-f5acdaf305a8
	Total devices 1 FS bytes used 15.82GB
	devid    1 size 227.53GB used 227.53GB path /dev/root

I just tried to make a new image with btrfs-image from
btrfs-progs-unstable (using "btrfs-image -c 9 /dev/vg_echo/lv_root
image2.Z").
Unlike when making the first image, the file system was mounted.  The
image is at <http://greed.fud.no/image2.Z> - is that any better?

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux