Ric Wheeler wrote: > I think that doing reflink by default would be a horrible idea - one > good reason to copy a file is to increase your level of fault > tolerance and reflink magically avoids that :-) Good point. This would constitute another user-visible semantic change in cp: a disk fault that affects any non-metadata block of a ref-linked file affects both copies. GNU cp will soon attempt this only when a --reflink option is specified. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
