Jim Meyering <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Thanks. I haven't looked, but after reading about the reflink syscall > [http://lwn.net/Articles/332802/] had come to the same conclusion: > this feature belongs with ln rather than with cp. cp already has -l so it would make sense to extend that too. > Besides, putting the new behavior on a new option avoids > the current semantic change we would otherwise induce in cp. I don't see how semantics change in a user visible way. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
