On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:12:38PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > Chris Mason wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > >>>Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow. > >>Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a > >>rebased version in a few minutes. > >> > > > >Ok, the rebased version is ready to use. > New results are up for both with and without nodatacow. Not much change. > > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html > > Have another run going with nodatacow and ssd. Hi Steve, I think I'm going to start tuning something other than the random-writes, there is definitely low hanging fruit in the large file creates workload ;) Thanks again for posting all of these. The history graph has 2.6.31-rc btrfs against 2.6.29-rc ext4. Have you done more recent runs on ext4? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
