It seem that we have a redundant btrfs_find_block_group() call in extent-tree.c/find_search_start(), is this guess right?
Signed-off-by: Li Yu <raise.sail@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/extent-tree.c b/extent-tree.c
index b2f9bb2..1c932c2 100644
--- a/extent-tree.c
+++ b/extent-tree.c
@@ -299,7 +299,6 @@ no_cache:
goto out;
}
cache = btrfs_find_block_group(root, cache, last, data, 0);
- cache = btrfs_find_block_group(root, cache, last, data, 0);
if (!cache)
goto no_cache;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
