Re: [PATCH] brtfs: less- and greater than confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2009 09:26 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> [ sorry, fixed up cc ]
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:22:52AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:48AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
>>> Without this the loop won't start
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> index 3ab80e9..2c873c9 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>>> @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
>>>  		}
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	for (i = 0; i > nr; i++) {
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>>  		struct btrfs_multi_bio *multi;
>>>  		struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe;
>>>  		int ret;
>> Thanks, this does look buggy.  That second loop should just be to verify
>> the first loop didn't mess things up.  Yan Zheng, is there any reason we
>> shouldn't delete it?
>>

It's OK to delete it.

Yan Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux