On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:48AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Without this the loop won't start
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 3ab80e9..2c873c9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
> }
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i > nr; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> struct btrfs_multi_bio *multi;
> struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe;
> int ret;
Thanks, this does look buggy. That second loop should just be to verify
the first loop didn't mess things up. Yan Zheng, is there any reason we
shouldn't delete it?
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
