Hello, Thanks a lot the explanations. In the v0.18 version used I indeed hit patch #1. The other patches don't seem to (may be in v0.19 ?). Cheers, Oliver On Saturday 11 July 2009 03:11:34 ashford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Oliver, > > > I just tried btrfs with a big blocksize (-n,-l,-s) of 256K. Creating the fs > > worked Ok. I had to put all three -n,-l,-s options to 256K, otherwise > > mkfs.btrfs complained. But mounting results in a soft lockup (reproducible). > > It's not the latest btrfs version however. The details are shown below. > > The problem is that the block size is being set to a value that's larger than > the memory page size. This is not supported. I sent in some validation > patches for the MKFS command in January, but they may not have been tested & > integrated yet. > > Good luck. > > Peter Ashford > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
