Oh ya :). Ummmm, whoops. I'll update and email revised charts over to Morten. If you want a more immediate answer, you can look at his original numbers at the beginning of this thread. Just check for it in a couple of days at the same URL's. I don't want to clog up this list with discussion about outdated benchmarks, of which this will soon be. --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Josh Berry <des@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Josh Berry <des@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: new benchmark btrfs 0.19 vs. ext4 > To: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Brian Neu" <proclivity76@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 9:46 PM > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 17:06, Morten > P.D. > Stevens<mstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > > thanks for the chart. > > > > Here are the results visually for all: > > > > http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs01.png > > > > http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs02.png > > What are the units? Are those measuring throughput or > latency? > > I read these graphs as saying btrfs is either blazingly > fast, > blazingly slow, or some combination thereof. ;) > > -- Josh > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
