Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:38:37 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [...]
> It's easy to throw cache at the problem and make it faster. That's like
> shaving weight off a car. Might make it go faster, definitely wont make
> it safer.

Interestingly nobody talks about "the other end" of the ssd market. Ok, a cf
card isn't really a ssd, but it is basically the same technology without very
intelligent controllers in front. So if you really want to see improvements
from ssd options this might be the most visible platform for playing. And
again, this is indeed a mainstream market, lots of routers and other embedded
gadgets use this - currently mostly implementing ram disks for performance
reasons.

-- 
Regards,
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux