On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Sander wrote: > Chris Mason wrote (ao): > > Jens Axboe tried to reproduce the phoronix results on his ocz drive, > > and generally found that each run was slower than the last regardless > > of which mount options were used. This isn't entirely surprising, but > > it did make it very difficult to nail down good or bad performance. > > The performance should stabilize within a handful max fills I believe? > > There should be a moment where things don't get more complicated for the > controller I thought. That's the idea, but every device is different, and they are very complex. Especially for write performance, tuning is a long and complex process...a simple benchmark run where you do three tries and average them isn't going to give you a great picture of drive performance. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
