Re: New experimental btrfs branch ready for testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Mason wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:38:45AM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
No problem. Raid results are uploading to http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html now. There were massive improvements in the random write workloads, especially with cow enabled!! MailServer had moderate perf gains, but dramatic decrease in CPU utilization, so this is very good as well.

The only regression I see is on large file creates, CPU is up 200% or more while performance is fairly flat. btrfs_tree_lock now dominates the profile.

I'm not able to reproduce the btrfs_tree_lock usage that you're seeing.
Could you please use the callgraph option to oprofile?

Ok, back from vacation and have re-engaged my brain :-) Was thinking I would have to re-run this for you, but we already have callgraph data for all the runs. For the 128 thread create workload it is here:
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid//2-6-30-rc7-newformat/btrfs-6-2-newformat/btrfs1.ffsb.large_file_creates__threads_0128.09-06-04_01.23.30/analysis/oprofile.breakout.001/oprofile-callgraph

Steve
-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux