Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 01:34 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Chris Mason schrieb:
> 
> >> However, with btrfs, I'm not sure about:
> >>
> >> - what happens if SAN machine crashes while the iSCSI file images were 
> >> being written to; with LVM and its block devices, I'm somehow more 
> >> confident it wouldn't make more data loss than necessary
> > 
> > If iscsi is writing with O_DIRECT|O_SYNC it should work.
> 
> What if it doesn't?
> 

Writes would go to the page cache only (not O_DIRECT) and the metadata
wouldn't get flushed with each write (not O_SYNC).

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux