Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Mason schrieb:

However, with btrfs, I'm not sure about:

- what happens if SAN machine crashes while the iSCSI file images were being written to; with LVM and its block devices, I'm somehow more confident it wouldn't make more data loss than necessary

If iscsi is writing with O_DIRECT|O_SYNC it should work.

What if it doesn't?


But, tuning
for this config is something we have to concentrate more on.

- taking snapshots of individual files (file images on SAN) is not possible with btrfs? Probably they would have to be placed in separate directories first to make snapshots - some minor manageability issue

Btrfs can't snapshot a single dir, but it can snapshot a single file.
See the bcp command included with btrfs-progs.

I'd also suggest using preallocated files (via fallocate) instead of
sparse files.  I will perform better in general.

When performance is needed - sure.


--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux