Re: Btrfs development plans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:10 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote:
> >  But now Oracle can re-license Solaris and merge ZFS with btrfs.
> > Just kidding, I don't think it would be technically feasible.
> >
> 
> May I suggest the name "ZbtrFS" :)
> Sorry couldn't resist. On a more serious note though, is there any
> technical benefits that justify continuing to push money in btrfs

The short answer from my point of view is yes.  This doesn't really
change the motivations for working on btrfs or the problems we're trying
to solve.

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux