Re: btrfs for enterprise raid arrays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:43 +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> > New firmware/microcode versions are able to reclaim that space if it
> > sees a certain number of consecutive zero's and will reclaim that 
> > space to the volume pool. Are there any thoughts on writing a 
> > low-priority tread that zeros out those "non-used" blocks?
> 
> Patches have been floating around to support this - see the recent 
> patches around "DISCARD" on linux-ide and lkml.  It would be great to 
> get access to a box that implemented the T10 proposed UNMAP commands 
> that we could test against. 

We've already made btrfs support TRIM, and Matthew has patches which
hook it up for ATA/IDE devices. Adding SCSI support shouldn't be hard
once the dust settles on the spec.

I don't think I've seen anybody talking about deliberately writing
zeroes instead of just issuing a discard command though. That doesn't
seem like a massively cunning plan.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux