Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: take block group fragmentation into account for allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




So the idea of the function is to return an integer in the range
[0,100]?

Why are we using a range of 0 to 100 anyway? 100 seems like an arbitary value for kernel space - why not just keep it as a value in the range [0,2^32) ? That eliminates the arbitary constant of 100, and in some cases could reduce the effects of rounding and allow finer control at no additional expense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux