On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Dongjun Shin <djshin90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A well-designed SSD should survive power cycling and should provide atomicity > of flush operation regardless of the underlying flash operations. I don't expect > that users of SSD have different requirements about atomicity. Well that's my point, it "should" provide atomicity, but is this the case for consumer SSDs? It is certainly NOT the case for cheap USB-based flash media and AFAIK not for CF either. -- Dmitri Nikulin Centre for Synchrotron Science Monash University Victoria 3800, Australia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
