On Feb 10 11:57 AM, Aaron Straus wrote:
> Thanks for the traceback, I'll look into it tonight and try to figure
> out what went wrong.
Hi,
Actually that's an easy one. That's a bad way of saying file not
found i.e. you tried to delete a snapshot that wasn't there. Please
apply the following patch on top of the previous one.
Thanks!
=a=
--
===================
Aaron Straus
aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 6e09873..496e8d6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -787,6 +787,12 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
mutex_unlock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ if (!inode) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: snapshot not found\n");
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto out_dput;
+ }
+
/* (1) locks needed? */
if (!(inode->i_mode & S_IFDIR)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: not directory\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
