On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:12 +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > >> > >> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and > >> it also looks that this one is more proper. > >> > >> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it. > >> > > > >Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff, makes the > >arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect. Thanks, > > Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :) Right now it is only used in the progs. The disk format doesn't really have a max there, it is just to keep names usable. But, we should add a check in the kernel ioctl side, are you interested in sending a patch for it? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
