On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 07:18 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
hi,
> As mentioned in the ioctl update email, I've released btrfs v0.18. This
> only includes the ioctl change and none of the patches that I've been
> queuing up for testing.
With the following patches everything looks good on 2.6.27.
diff --git a/compat.h b/compat.h
index 7c4503e..74d2e32 100644
--- a/compat.h
+++ b/compat.h
@@ -4,4 +4,28 @@
#define btrfs_drop_nlink(inode) drop_nlink(inode)
#define btrfs_inc_nlink(inode) inc_nlink(inode)
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE <= KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 27)
+static inline struct dentry *d_obtain_alias(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ struct dentry *d;
+
+ if (!inode)
+ return NULL;
+ if (IS_ERR(inode))
+ return ERR_CAST(inode);
+
+ d = d_alloc_anon(inode);
+ if (!d)
+ iput(inode);
+ return d;
+}
+#endif
+
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 28)
+# define __pagevec_lru_add_file __pagevec_lru_add
+# define open_bdev_exclusive open_bdev_excl
+# define close_bdev_exclusive(bdev, mode) close_bdev_excl(bdev)
+typedef unsigned __bitwise__ fmode_t;
+#endif
+
#endif /* _COMPAT_H_ */
diff --git a/extent-tree.c b/extent-tree.c
index 293da65..41fc059 100644
--- a/extent-tree.c
+++ b/extent-tree.c
@@ -869,7 +869,11 @@ static noinline int remove_extent_backref(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
static void btrfs_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev,
u64 start, u64 len)
{
- blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, GFP_KERNEL);
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 28)
+ blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, GFP_KERNEL);
+#else
+ blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9);
+#endif
}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
