Re: Definitive btrfs git tree ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 8:28:21 am Chris Mason wrote:

> Only mainline is definitive ;)

Oh ha ha! ;-)

> We'll have a tree with stable fixes that we want Linus to pull, and
> we'll have a development tree with unstable experimental stuff (these
> aren't yet named).

Ah, so for the moment stick with btrfs-unstable-standalone ?

> For the progs, the btrfs-progs-unstable tree is up to date and safe.
> I'll make something with a less scary name later this week, and save the
> unstable tree for development.

Cool, not scary is good (though I'm happy to stay with the scary one).

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux