On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:10:20PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> GCC 4.3 should be good in compiling the >> >> kernel with default -Os settings. >> > >> > It's unfortunately not. It doesn't inline a lot of simple asm() inlines >> > for example. >> >> Reading Ingos posting with the actual numbers states the opposite. > > Hugh had some numbers upto 4.4.0 20090102 in > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/775254/focus=777231 > > which demonstrated the problem. How about GCC bugzillas with testcases that we can fix and enter into the testsuite to make sure future GCC versions won't regress? Richard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
