On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > Does gcc actually follow the "promise"? If that's the case (and if it's > > considered a bug when it doesn't), then we can get what Linus wants by > > annotating EVERY function with either __always_inline or noinline. > > > > __always_inline and noinline does work. I vote for the, get rid of the current inline, rename __always_inline to inline, and then remove all non needed inlines from the kernel. We'll, probably start adding a lot more noinlines. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
