Unrelated: On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Chris Mason wrote: > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8024f4de>] [<ffffffff8024f4de>] __cmpxchg+0x36/0x3f Ouch. HOW THE HELL DID THAT NOT GET INLINED? cmpxchg() is a _single_ instruction if it's inlined, but it's a horrible mess of dynamic conditionals on the (constant - per call-site) size argument if it isn't. It looks like you probably enabled the "let gcc mess up inlining" config option. Ingo - I think we need to remove that crap again. Because gcc gets the inlining horribly horribly wrong. As usual. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
