This has been bothering me for some time. Why does btrfs need to have a disk greater then 256M? I could see a much smaller limit, say 16M but why so much? The file system itself does not need that much space for its own use.
In other words, 256M limit rather disqualifies btrfs as a filesystem i.e. for /boot, doesn't it?
-- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
