On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 21:07 +1100, Chris Samuel wrote: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 8:01:04 am Andi Kleen wrote: > > > When it's in mainline I suspect people will start using it for that. > > Some people don't even wait for that. ;-) > > Seriously though, if that is a concern can I suggest taking the btrfsdev route > and, if you want a real belt and braces approach, perhaps require it to have a > mandatory mount option specified to successfully mount, maybe "eat_my_data" ? I think ext4dev made more sense for ext4 because people generally expect ext* to be stable. Btrfs doesn't quite have the reputation for stability yet, so I don't feel we need a special -dev name for it. But, if Andrew/Linus prefer that unstable filesystems are tagged with -dev, I'm happy to do it. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
