Re: BTRFS Performance page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
Replying to Steven Pratt:
Steven Pratt wrote:
RAID data is now uploaded. The config used is 136 15k rpm fiber disks in 8 arrays all striped together with DM. These results are not as favorable to BTRFS, as there seem to be some major issues with random write and mail server workloads.

Why don't use btrfs' own RAID capabilities instead?
Honestly, I will never ever use md as soon as I'll get btrfs working
:)

On the list of things to try. Main reason was we wanted to be able to compare to other file systems and they are lacking that feature.
Steve

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/Initial-compare/Initial-Compare-RAID0.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux