Re: raid 1 / raid 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Eric Anopolsky <erpo41@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 04:12 -0400, rektide wrote:
>> Is there any case where the third and fourth disks would be
>> used with -m raid1 -d raid1?
>
> Perhaps when the first pair of disks fill up? I don't know. I'm new
> here.

I didn't check the code, that would be kind of a "linear append"..
which is dump....
I was expecting a raid1 with 4 discs, to have exactly 3 copies of the
original data, with each disk being a complete mirror.

If we only have 1 copy (plus original), and therefore use only 2 disks
for any individual write, probably, if we generate enough write load
to make a couple of disks busy, it will use the second couple of disks
also.
Basically, the allocator should be able to balance the write load, and
spread allocations to all devices.. however.. if the write load is
insuficient to saturate a single pair of devices, there's no point in
using the second pair.. it would just make the machine burn more watts
This is pure speculation...

Best thing is to look at the code. :)

Kind regards,

-- 
Miguel Sousa Filipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux