On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:59 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason > > - if (search_end == (u64)-1) > - search_end = btrfs_super_total_bytes(&info->super_copy); > > happened in the commit from $SUBJECT? If its just a mistake thats fine I'll add > it back with my current patch, but if there is a reason it needed to go then I > need to know that too so I can figure out a different way to do what I want to > do. Thanks, Yan removed this as part of the prep code for space balancing. It is probably because he needs to change btrfs_super_total_bytes and we can't rely on it as search_end anymore. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
