On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 16:31 +0100, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:19 +0200, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > >> Hello everybody! > >> > >> This is my first post on the list, let me know if I'm not following any > >> rules. > >> > >> What do you think about adding priorities for raid1 arrays? > >> > >> For example, always use /dev/ram0 (ramdisk) for reading/writing, but > >> nonetheless write everything additionally on /dev/sda1. Restore to > >> /dev/ram0 after mount if it is empty. > >> > > > > I don't plan on adding support for non-persistent storage, but there > > will be the idea of a fast frontend device that is basically a cache for > > slower devices. > > Something like yet another caching/buffer layer between the buffer > cache and the storage devices? > Not really a caching layer, more of a block allocation group that when full migrates old blocks to a different block allocation group. > I recall reading something similiar to that in a listing of new > features of a recent revision of ZFS ? > Sorry, no idea. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
