This would be a kind of filesystem block level compression, right? On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:28 PM, <btrfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Don't do it!!! >> >> OK, I know Chris has described some block sharing. But I hate it. >> >> If I copy "resume" to "resume.save", it is because I want 2 copies >> for safety. I don't want the fs to reduce it to 1 copy. And >> reducing the duplicates is exactly opposite to Chris's paranoid >> make-multiple-copies-by-default. >> >> Now feel free to tell me I'm an idiot (other people do) :) > > In situations where there's non-trivial benefits to some workloads, but > also non-trivial drawbacks, it strikes me as something that could be > enabled and disabled as a mount option, like data=ordered. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
