Ahmed Kamal wrote:
An experiment of applying RS codes for protecting data, worth a look http://ttsiodras.googlepages.com/rsbep.html He overwrites a series of 127 sectors and still manages to correctly recover his data. We all know disks give us unreadable sectors every now and then, so at least on workstations/laptops this could really be useful ? Advantage over single-disk-raid1 is storage efficiency (4.2MB becomes 5.2MB), that means we get 80% of useable disk space, instead of 50% if I decide to raid1 everything ?
This is an interesting idea and could help recover from some types of failures (for example, single head failures) or localized bad sectors (think of dust or junk on the platter). This is almost certainly a big win for single disk systems. You would probably still need to RAID (or do other protection schemes) to get enterprise class data availability since you clearly cannot handle a full drive failure whenever you have multiple drives in a system.
Thanks! ric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
