Hi all, On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yan and I are hammering this out a little, I've attached my current > patches. > > I was seeing cache misses after long stress runs, which I think is > coming from references on the higher levels of the tree making us skip > some leaves while dropping the transaction that added them. > > My new version using a single cache per root, and should avoid these > misses. Just curious, what is the cache size and or eviction policy? Is it LFU or LRU, fifo, something custom? Would ARC be a good policy for this purpose? Sorry if this is totally off-topic or clueless, just curious.. hell, I'm not even shure what data/info/object is the cache for... Kind regards, -- Miguel Sousa Filipe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
