On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 09:28 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 07:13 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Chris, can you please put this patch in? Without it btrfs can't be > > loaded on 32bit platforms. > > > > I've pushed out a slightly different fix. The ordered extents are > based on ram writeback, and so an unsigned long is enough. Does the job for me, although we still need the s/BUG_ON(spin_trylock(&tree->lock))/assert_spin_locked(&tree->lock)/ patch I sent a few days ago. Now I can actually build the module, load it and avoid it hitting a BUG_ON() when it first tries to mount, I can perhaps move on to doing something more useful with it... :) -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
