On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:41 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:03 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > Well, the test is there to make sure the caller is doing the right > > thing. Before we remove it, I'd like to understand why it is failing. > > Because this is a uniprocessor kernel. So spin_lock() and spin_unlock() > both do absolutely nothing, and spin_trylock() _always_ returns 1. > Duh, sorry that's what you were saying all along. For some reason I saw UP machine on SMP kernel in your email. Thanks for the patch, I'll pull it in. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
