Ahmed Kamal wrote:
Thanks Linda, I located the kernel message. Is it normal such issues
are not tracked in the project's bugzilla:
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Btrfs
which only contains 5 bugs ?!
I suppose it depends on whether its a bug with something that's
supposed to work or whether its a feature that's not quite
implemented yet. I think in this case, btrfsctl is providing
some basic capabilities to assist development and testing and
is quite likely to evolve, so to me this wasn't a bugzilla item.
Chris might have different advice though.
-- ljk
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@xxxxxx> wrote:
Ahmed Kamal wrote:
[root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb
ioctl returns 0
[root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc
ioctl returns 0
/dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output
supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ?
I think not so much of a bug as not completely implemented.
If you look in /var/log/messages or where every your kernel
messages go, you'll see information about the file system on
the device. At least that's how it worked for me.
-- ljk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
